1. Reasons or facts by themselves do not necessarily lead to one and only one decision. In this case, for instance, could you make the case that the court strains to find on behalf of Norton? Clue: Review the reasoning under the section “Size of the Project and Report.” Could that same evidence have been used to overturn the original decision?
2. Is “cumulative impacts” ambiguous? In other words, is it reasonable to wonder just what that term means in this instance? Clue: Read the second paragraph under “Cumulative Impacts.”
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here