1. In Hurry v. Jones, a court footnote mentioned that the school argued that the parents should be required to mitigate damages. Is that position valid? Why or why not? 2. In Hurry v. Jones, the...

1. In Hurry v. Jones, a court footnote mentioned that the school argued that the parents should be required to mitigate damages. Is that position valid? Why or why not?

2. In Hurry v. Jones, the school did not address the regulation’s validity because of its reliance on the issue of a good-faith standard, a standard that changed during the litigation. Tactically, what should the school’s attorney have done?