1. In Example 10.4, we wrote the model that explicitly contains the long-run propensity, u0, as
gfrt5 a0 1 u0pet1 d1 1pet21 2pet2 1 d2 1pet22 2pet2 1u,
where we omit the other explanatory variables for simplicity. As always with multiple regression analysis, u0 should have a ceteris paribus interpretation. Namely, ifpetincreases by one (dollar) holding 1pet21 2pet2 and 1pet22 2pet2 fixed,gfrtshould change by u0.
(i) If 1pet21 2pet2 and 1pet22 2pet2 are held fixed butpetis increasing, what must be true about
changes inpet21 andpet22?
(ii) How does your answer in part (i) help you to interpret u0 in the above equation as the LRP?
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here