1. How can the relativist defend the view that morality is completely relative to human opinion at the same time that these common facts seem to indicate some similarities in the moral rules of...

1. How can the relativist defend the view that morality is completely relative to human opinion at the same time that these common facts seem to indicate some similarities in the moral rules of different societies?

2. If everyone in history had been conventional ethical relativists, what differences would we have seen in history and in the world today? What differences would be better? What would be worse?