1. Give a statement of the opponent’s philosophy that summarizes the stand to be taken against the advocate’s case. 2. Challenge or accept the advocate’s definition of the value object. 3. Consider...

1.
Give a statement of the opponent’s philosophy that summarizes the stand to

be taken against the advocate’s case.

2.
Challenge or accept the advocate’s definition of the value object.

3.
Consider the criteria that should be used to measure the value object.

a.
Is the asserted value as good as the advocate claims?

1.
Does society recognize it as good?

2.
Do experts in the field recognize it as good?

b.
Have the value criteria been correctly identified?

1.
Are there other values involved in the standard used?

2.
Does the advocate provide adequate justification for the value criteria

selected?

3.
Is there a better standard by which to evaluate the value object?