1. Event description (300 words) Briefly explain the event you are going to analyse. Tell the reader what happened, who did it happen to, what did you do, how did you feel, what you thought, what was...

1. Event description (300 words)
Briefly explain the event you are going to analyse. Tell the reader what happened, who did it happen to, what did you do, how did you feel, what you thought, what was the outcome.
2. Ways of Knowing (1000 words)
Consider the ways of knowing that informed this event. Use Carper’s ways of knowing as subheadings. Even though it is possible that one form of knowledge dominated, you must show evidence of having considered the impact of each, and if it is not relevant, explain why not.
a)  Empirics (identify the relevant science, medicine, policy, procedure etc.) b)  Esthetics (identify the elements of your practice that you ‘just knew’, the intuition, the care, empathy etc.) Think about how this is different to the empirics. c)  Personal (identify the ways in which you bought your personal self into this event. How did your values, your ‘therapeutic use of self’ influence the way this event unfolded?) d)  Ethical (identify the ethical and political aspects of this event. Where the patients rights upheld, if not why not, etc