1. Do the outsourcing issues facing Apple really concern consumers? Explain. Comment on the results disclosed in Apple’s supplier responsibility report. Should these be disconcerting to investors? 3....

1 answer below »



  1. 1.
    Do the outsourcing issues facing Apple really concern consumers? Explain.

  2. Comment on the results disclosed in Apple’s supplier responsibility report. Should these be disconcerting to investors?


3. Since Steve Jobs’s death, it appears that Apple has become much more transparent in what officials publish about the company. Why do you think this has happened?


4 Should Apple have any responsibility for the events at Foxconn? Explain your position.


5 Can you find any other HR related ethical violations involving Apple? If so what would your solution be as described within the ethical cycle.




Stanwick, Understanding Business Ethics, 3e Instructor Resource Case 22: Wal-Mart: But We Do Give Them A 10 Percent Employee Discount Case Summary Wal-Mart stirs a lot of emotions from many people. People either love or hate the company. Its influence has significantly impacted global retailing. Wal-Mart’s very simple strategy of Everyday Low Prices drives every single decision at Wal-Mart. As a result, payroll expenses are always monitored and evaluated, especially with close to 1.5 million employees worldwide. Therefore, there are huge financial benefits for Wal-Mart to cut every corner they can when it can reduce the cost structure of its business model. Examples such as “off the clock work” are not only present at Wal-Mart, but could also be considered an industry wide issue. In any setting in which a time clock records the number of hours worked by an employee, there is always the opportunity to abuse the system. While an innocent request such as “can you tidy up that shelf before you leave” may not have any cost impact, Wal-Mart appears at times to abuse the loyalty of its employees by asking them to work long after they have clocked out. Health benefits are another area where Wal-Mart has been able to minimize its cost structure for the employees. Placing hurdles for eligibility and having high level of deductibles allows Wal-Mart to block some of its employees from signing up for health coverage while others only accept minimum coverage. The issue of sexual discrimination has been a major stumbling block for Wal-Mart as it moves to being a global presence. It could be hypothesized that the “good old boy” culture established by Sam Wilton in rural Arkansas did not condemn managers who perceived that female employees should not be able to have a career at Wal-Mart. The recent legal class action lawsuits may have given Wal-Mart the impetus it needed to change its corporate culture. Again, based on its “good old boy culture”, Wal-Mart has never looked favorably on unions. It believes that only Wal-Mart knows what is best for its employees. Wal-Mart is still actively involved in stopping unions from being formed for its workers in the United States. Of course, the ironic twist is that when Wal-Mart started in China, the Chinese government made it a requirement that every employee be unionized. The net result is that Wal-Mart has always walked a fine line between ethical and unethical behavior when it examines the relationships between treatment of employees and reducing costs. Teaching Note You can start the discussion by asking how many students go to Wal-Mart on a regular basis, assuming you are near a Wal-Mart. If you are, ask them why they go. The universal answer will probably be because everything is cheaper at Wal-Mart. You can then ask should Wal-Mart do whatever it can to reduce its prices. Again they would say yes within the law. At this point you could ask why don’t the employees quit if they are not been treated properly. The likely response is that for many of these workers this could be the only job available and/or the highest paying job in the local community. The thread of the discussion is that the employees need Wal-Mart and Wal-Mart needs the employees. The only difference is that Wal-Mart has absolute bargaining power with its employees like it does with its suppliers. Every single supplier and employee needs Wal-Mart more than Wal-Mart needs the employee and the supplier. Of course, Wal-Mart knows this and, therefore, will always negotiate for a position of power. Wal-Mart makes it very clear when an associate is hired that the firm is committed to lower the cost of production. As a result, no employee should be surprised when Wal-Mart does whatever it can to reduce costs. Questions for Thought 1. Are the ethical issues Wal-Mart faces really any different from other large retailers? 2. Wal-Mart officials have stated that they don’t feel women are interested in management positions at the company. Do you agree or disagree? 3. Wal-Mart is continually criticized for its health-care policy. Is this really an ethical issue? Why or why not? 4. Should Wal-Mart be concerned about unionization of stores since allowing unionization of workers in China? Stanwick, Understanding Business Ethics , 3e Instructor Resource Case 22: Wal - Mart: But We Do Give Them A 10 Percent Employee Discount Case Summary Wal - Mart stirs a lot of emotions from many people. People either love or hate the company. I ts influence has significantly impacted global retailing. Wal - Mart’s very simple strategy of Everyday Low Prices drives every single decision at Wal - Mart. As a result, payroll expenses are always monitored and evaluated, especially with close to 1.5 millio n employees worldwide. Therefore, there are huge financial benefits for Wal - Mart to cut every corner they can when it can reduce the cost structure of its business model. Examples such as “off the clock work” are not only present at Wal - Mart, but could als o be considered an industry wide issue. In any setting in which a time clock records the number of hours worked by an employee, there is always the opportunity to abuse the system. While an innocent request such as “can you tidy up that shelf before you le ave” may not have any cost impact, Wal - Mart appears at times to abuse the loyalty of its employees by asking them to work long after they have clocked out. Health benefits are another area where Wal - Mart has been able to minimize its cost structure for th e employees. Placing hurdles for eligibility and having high level of deductibles allows Wal - Mart to block some of its employees from signing up for health coverage while others only accept minimum coverage. The issue of sexual discrimination has been a major stumbling block for Wal - Mart as it moves to being a global presence. It could be hypothesized that the “good old boy” culture established by Sam Wilton in rural Arkansas did not condemn managers who perceived that female employees should not be able to have a career at Wal - Mart. The recent legal class action lawsuits may have given Wal - Mart the impetus it needed to change its corporate culture. Again, based on its “good old boy culture”, Wal - Mart has never looked favorably on unions. It believe s that only Wal - Mart knows what is best for its employees. Wal - Mart is still actively involved in stopping unions from being formed for its workers in the United States. Of course, the ironic twist is that when Wal - Mart started in China, the Chinese government m ade it a requirement that every employee be unionized. The net result is that Wal - Mart has always walked a fine line between ethical and unethical behavior when it examines the relationships between treatment of employees and reducing costs. Teaching Note You can start the discussion by asking how many students go to Wal - Mart on a regular basis, assuming you are near a Wal - Mart. If you are, ask them why they go. The universal answer will probably be because everything is cheaper at Wal - Mart. You can then a sk should Wal - Mart do whatever it can to reduce its prices. Again they would say yes within the law. At this point you could ask why don’t the employees quit if they are not been treated properly. The likely response Stanwick, Understanding Business Ethics, 3e Instructor Resource Case 22: Wal-Mart: But We Do Give Them A 10 Percent Employee Discount Case Summary Wal-Mart stirs a lot of emotions from many people. People either love or hate the company. Its influence has significantly impacted global retailing. Wal-Mart’s very simple strategy of Everyday Low Prices drives every single decision at Wal-Mart. As a result, payroll expenses are always monitored and evaluated, especially with close to 1.5 million employees worldwide. Therefore, there are huge financial benefits for Wal-Mart to cut every corner they can when it can reduce the cost structure of its business model. Examples such as “off the clock work” are not only present at Wal-Mart, but could also be considered an industry wide issue. In any setting in which a time clock records the number of hours worked by an employee, there is always the opportunity to abuse the system. While an innocent request such as “can you tidy up that shelf before you leave” may not have any cost impact, Wal-Mart appears at times to abuse the loyalty of its employees by asking them to work long after they have clocked out. Health benefits are another area where Wal-Mart has been able to minimize its cost structure for the employees. Placing hurdles for eligibility and having high level of deductibles allows Wal-Mart to block some of its employees from signing up for health coverage while others only accept minimum coverage. The issue of sexual discrimination has been a major stumbling block for Wal-Mart as it moves to being a global presence. It could be hypothesized that the “good old boy” culture established by Sam Wilton in rural Arkansas did not condemn managers who perceived that female employees should not be able to have a career at Wal-Mart. The recent legal class action lawsuits may have given Wal-Mart the impetus it needed to change its corporate culture. Again, based on its “good old boy culture”, Wal-Mart has never looked favorably on unions. It believes that only Wal-Mart knows what is best for its employees. Wal-Mart is still actively involved in stopping unions from being formed for its workers in the United States. Of course, the ironic twist is that when Wal-Mart started in China, the Chinese government made it a requirement that every employee be unionized. The net result is that Wal-Mart has always walked a fine line between ethical and unethical behavior when it examines the relationships between treatment of employees and reducing costs. Teaching Note You can start the discussion by asking how many students go to Wal-Mart on a regular basis, assuming you are near a Wal-Mart. If you are, ask them why they go. The universal answer will probably be because everything is cheaper at Wal-Mart. You can then ask should Wal-Mart do whatever it can to reduce its prices. Again they would say yes within the law. At this point
Answered 1 days AfterMay 11, 2021

Answer To: 1. Do the outsourcing issues facing Apple really concern consumers? Explain. Comment on the results...

Bidusha answered on May 12 2021
153 Votes
Apple Wal-Mart and Ethical Issues        4
APPLE, WAL-MART AND ETHICAL ISSUES
Table of Contents
Outsourcing Issues of Apple    3
Comments on The Results Disclosed in Apple’s Supplier Responsibility Report    3
Comments on results:    4
Personal Opinion on Apple After Job’s Death    4
Apples Responsibility on the Events of Foxconn    5
HR Related Ethical Violations in Apple    5
Ethical Issues Faced by Wal-Mart    6
Women’s Interest in Management Position    7
Ethical Issue or Not    7
Threa
t of Unionization    8
Ethical Dilemma between Egoism and Utilitarianism    8
Comparison between Deontology, Teleology and Mixed Frameworks    9
Stakeholders Theory    9
Importance of Some Stakeholders Theory    10
References    11
Outsourcing Issues of Apple
Apple's outsourcing problems affect their customers for a variety of reasons, including the company's national job, employment protection, customer safety, and the company's CSR. To delve further, a customer has a certain level of confidence in the businesses that supply them with goods and services. They have faith in the business to provide them with high-quality goods while adhering to ethical and controlled procedures. As environmental management, labor rights, worker health/safety, and code of ethics laws are violated, it throws a black cloud on the company and undermines the expectations that its customers have (Koene et al., 2019). These aspects have an effect not only on the internal structure of the business, but also on the fields in which the company manufactures its goods. These environments are inhabited by both potential customers and business staff. When Apple breaks these rules and business practices for the reasons mentioned above, it has a negative impact on the community and the environment. Outsourcing to other areas not only harms their culture, but it also harms other places where the work might have been done in a much safer way while also providing national monetary assistance.
Comments on The Results Disclosed in Apple’s Supplier Responsibility Report
a. 1008 facilities failed to pay staff the correct amount of overtime. b. 137 employees were hospitalized due to chemical exposure in the last two years.
c. Average enforcement rate with workers' rights: 74 percent in 2011 and 81 percent in 2013, a 7 percent rise. Workers' average protection and health enforcement rate: 76% in 2011 and 77% in 2013, a 1% rise. The total environmental effect of Apple's supplier code of ethics was 79 percent in 2011 and 77 percent in 2013, a 2 percent decline. Hazardous drug control was increased by 4%, and air emissions were increased by 3%.
d. In their first audit in 2013, Apple's overall ethical approval score was 95%.
Comments on results:
After Steve Jobs died and the facts of the company's manufacturing conditions were published, there was a shift in management. For the very first time, the nation would have seen the information that Apple has been burying for years. I do not agree that enforcement rates in excess of 70% should be accepted. They are trying to improve, but for a business of this size to have so many internal challenges without any sort of punishment is abhorrent. I sincerely hope that since the publication of this report, the circumstances under which this business operates have changed, but this is a remote possibility. It's better to do the complete opposite to mask the negative sides of the production process than it is to bring in more time and resources to do it correctly. In the business world, what is ethical and equitable is not necessarily the cheapest or first choice. Concerning for investors? Despite the fact that these findings show unfavorable reviews on the company's ethical manufacturing decisions, consumers are searching for production and benefit. Investors will continue to pour in as long as consumers continue to buy Apple products and no harsh penalties are imposed due to subpar enforcement data.
Personal Opinion on Apple After Job’s Death
I assume Steve Jobs felt it was unnecessary for consumers to be aware of how his goods were made and processed. It's a negative feature of Apple, and if the corporation isn't legally obliged to share the details also with people, why does he want to reveal the data? With more businesses doing production audits and disclosing all of their cards, it is preferable to be open about the flaws rather than conceal them and risk getting the details published. As time passes, there is a revaluation of media and dissemination, and it is difficult to conceal knowledge in our new culture.
Apples Responsibility on the Events of Foxconn
Yes, Apple should have a responsibility for the events at Foxconn since Foxconn is a multinational producer to which Apple outsources product...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here