1. Chief Justice Roberts’s opinion relies on drawing several legal analogies to compare and contrast United Haulers with other cases. What are the legal analogies Roberts makes? Are the legal analogies appropriate? Clue: Are the facts of the various cases Roberts discusses similar to those in United Haulers? Are there relevant differences in the fact patterns?
2. What ethical norm is responsible for Chief Justice Roberts’s reasoning? Clue: What ethical norms might someone who disagrees with Roberts hold?
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here