FOOD30010 Functional Foods Assignment 2019 In this self-learning task, you are to discuss the effect of food processing or cooking on health. This assessment aims to develop your skills in reviewing informative articles and to collate and summarise the information. It also aims to further extend your knowledge on the effect of modified food components due to processing and cooking on health. The format of the assignment is one of a mini-review article. It should be in essay-style, with opening introductory and finishing (or concluding) paragraph. An abstract is not required. The topic should be specific rather than generic, that is your discussion should be focus and in-depth. This assessment is worth 25% (25 marks) of your final mark. You should submit an online copy of your assignment via TURNITIN by the due date. A late penalty of 2.5 marks per day will be applied. Presentation and Structure · Stay within the word limit of 1500±300 words limit · In-text citations are included in the word count · References and words in diagrams, tables and figures are excluded from the count · Include an introductory paragraph and a concluding statement. · Have a logical flow of ideas to your essay and use each paragraph to focus on one or two points. · DO NOT reproduce figures and tables of data from published sources. Your assignment is not about you commenting on specific experimental results obtained by others, which is a higher order task. Discuss the general findings instead. You can create your own table containing information from different sources if you so wish. Scientific Content · Make sure the information you present is correct and that you use legitimate sources available · You will need to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the topic and link the various contents in a coherence manner · Discuss the information you obtain from your reading of the research papers and link them to research papers rather than reproducing the information Writing Style · Use scientific language and write objectively. Speculation should be avoided. · Take the time to check your spelling, grammar and punctuation. Make sure you use words correctly. Don’t overly rely on spell check to pick up mistakes; the ‘wrong’ word might still be a correctly spelt word! · Avoid using quotes, even if they are cited correctly. Quotes are very rarely used in scientific writing and quoting them does not in themselves demonstrate that you understand the material or that it is true. · You may use external people to check your review for clarity and general English usage. The Academic Skills Unit may be an appropriate resource for you http://www.services.unimelb.edu.au/asu/ Research and Referencing · America Chemical Society Literature Citation Rules or Harvard Referencing Style should be used (http://www.lib.unimelb.edu.au/cite/harvard_lfr/index.html) · Reference to textbooks should be avoided unless it is a specialist text · Example, an edited textbook with contributions by a number of authors from various research institutions is usually a specialist text · Internet sources should be also be avoided unless it is from a legitimate source · Example, publications from a Government agency (Eg FSANZ, WHO, NIH), industry (Eg CSIRO) or research institution (Eg University of Melbourne). · Absolutely no Wikipedia or quoting lecture notes · Avoid extensive citing from a single source · It highlights your limited reading · Citing from 10 more legitimate sources would be required. · Check that you include in your reference list all references cited in the text. · Take care to acknowledge other people’s ideas: cite their work (i.e. when you paraphrase). Do not plagiarise or collude; explain in your own words. For guidance see http://academichonesty.unimelb.edu.au/ · Supersearch is a useful tool to search for and access peer reviewed journal articles. You can find this tool on the library website. Web of Science and Pubmed will be good databases to use. · Use correct referencing style and one referencing style throughout · While no marks are awarded for correct referencing, up to 2.5 marks will be deducted for incorrect referencing. Marking Scheme ASSIGNMENT MARKING SCHEME Disappointing Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent Scientific Writing, Understanding & Research (25 marks) Well-structured, with coherence & logical flow of information<5 5="" 6="" 7="" 8="" 9-10="" demonstrated="" understanding="" of="" the="" topic="">5><5 5 6 7 8 9-10 research depth 0 1 2 3 4 5 referencing:students are expected to be able to reference literature sources correctly at 3rd year level. as such, incorrect referencing will incur a penalty of up to -5 marks. research depth: refers to the number of literature read and discussed. just citing a publication does not constitute a count in research depth. america chemical society literature citation rules references (in alphabetical order): · journals articles authors. (year). article title. journal name. volume, pages. loo yt, howell k, chan m. zhang p & ng k (2020). modulation of the human gut microbiota by phenolics and phenolic fiber-rich foods. comprehensive review in food science & food safety, 19, 1268-1298. hsi-yang tang, zhongxiang fang & ken ng (2020). dietary fiber-based colon-targeted delivery systems for polyphenols. trends in food science & technology, 100, 333-348. note: there are many iteration of this referencing style and all are acceptable. for example, authors could be cited as loo, y.t. etc or completely spelled out, or article title or journal name, volume and pages in bold. the important rule is consistency, that is when you use one iteration style you must use the same for the whole work. · books: authors. in book title, edition no., editors publisher, year, vol. no., pages. smith, l; caldwell, a. cellulose in cell walls. in forage cell wall structure & digestability; keys, f., park, g., eds.; publisher: harwood academics, 2001; vol. 4, 261-295. · chapters in a book illyama k, lam tb, meikle jp, ng k, rhodes d, & stone ba (1993). cell wall biosynthesis and its regulation. proceedings of the international symposium on forage cell wall structure & digestibility. editors jung h, buxton d, hartfield r, & ralph j. chapter 24:621-83. · government & institutions internet sources: add authors if they are specified authors related to the article. food standards australia new zealand (fsanz): 19th australian total diet survey (2010). http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/scienceandeducation/publications/ 19thaustraliantotaldietsurveyapril2001/19thaustraliantotaldietsurvey/partbresults.cfm (accessed xx november 14-2010). references named or cited in the text: · for single article cited with 1 or 2 authors, (chan, 1999) (chan & steven, 2004) · for single article cited with more than 2 authors, only the first author is listed, (steven et al., 2006) · for multiple articles cited, list by order of the year of publication of the articles, (lucenda et al., 2010; steven et al., 2006; mohagen, 2004; cartwright et al., 2000) · for multiple articles by the same first authors appearing in different years, differentiate by a,b,csubscripts, (chana, 2003; chanb, 2003) (burke et al., 2009a, burke et al., 2009b) assignment topics choose only one 1. protein modifications during cooking and the impact on health. discuss the effects of cooking on protein in foods. do not focus on the cooking methods themselves as it deviates from the topic. rather, discuss the cooking methods that produces the modifications or changes. the focus of the assay should be on the cooking effects that include oxidative modification of proteins such as maillard reactions and other structural or conformational changes that affect protein digestibility. protein indigestibility will lead to loss of protein quality such as reduced availability of essential amino acids. digestion of modified proteins will produce modified amino acids that might cause harm to the body. 2. colonic fermentation of undigested proteins and health. what happen to undigested proteins? what products are form if they are fermented in the colon? what are the effects on health? you should leave out whey proteins as this belongs to topic 3. 3. bioactive peptides from fermentation of whey proteins and health. fermentation of whey proteins produces specific products and their effect on health has been widely studied. discuss. 4. immunogenic peptides generated from partial protein digestion and health. partial digestion of wheat gluten is known to generate immunogenic peptides that is like to diseases such as coeliac diseases. discuss. 3 5="" 6="" 7="" 8="" 9-10="" research="" depth="" 0="" 1="" 2="" 3="" 4="" 5="" referencing:="" students="" are="" expected="" to="" be="" able="" to="" reference="" literature="" sources="" correctly="" at="" 3rd="" year="" level.="" as="" such,="" incorrect="" referencing="" will="" incur="" a="" penalty="" of="" up="" to="" -5="" marks.="" research="" depth:="" refers="" to="" the="" number="" of="" literature="" read="" and="" discussed.="" just="" citing="" a="" publication="" does="" not="" constitute="" a="" count="" in="" research="" depth.="" america="" chemical="" society="" literature="" citation="" rules="" references="" (in="" alphabetical="" order):="" ·="" journals="" articles="" authors.="" (year).="" article="" title.="" journal="" name.="" volume,="" pages.="" loo="" yt,="" howell="" k,="" chan="" m.="" zhang="" p="" &="" ng="" k="" (2020).="" modulation="" of="" the="" human="" gut="" microbiota="" by="" phenolics="" and="" phenolic="" fiber-rich="" foods.="" comprehensive="" review="" in="" food="" science="" &="" food="" safety,="" 19,="" 1268-1298.="" hsi-yang="" tang,="" zhongxiang="" fang="" &="" ken="" ng="" (2020).="" dietary="" fiber-based="" colon-targeted="" delivery="" systems="" for="" polyphenols.="" trends="" in="" food="" science="" &="" technology,="" 100,="" 333-348.="" note:="" there="" are="" many="" iteration="" of="" this="" referencing="" style="" and="" all="" are="" acceptable.="" for="" example,="" authors="" could="" be="" cited="" as="" loo,="" y.t.="" etc="" or="" completely="" spelled="" out,="" or="" article="" title="" or="" journal="" name,="" volume="" and="" pages="" in="" bold.="" the="" important="" rule="" is="" consistency,="" that="" is="" when="" you="" use="" one="" iteration="" style="" you="" must="" use="" the="" same="" for="" the="" whole="" work.="" ·="" books:="" authors.="" in="" book="" title,="" edition="" no.,="" editors="" publisher,="" year,="" vol.="" no.,="" pages.="" smith,="" l;="" caldwell,="" a.="" cellulose="" in="" cell="" walls.="" in="" forage="" cell="" wall="" structure="" &="" digestability;="" keys,="" f.,="" park,="" g.,="" eds.;="" publisher:="" harwood="" academics,="" 2001;="" vol.="" 4,="" 261-295.="" ·="" chapters="" in="" a="" book="" illyama="" k,="" lam="" tb,="" meikle="" jp,="" ng="" k,="" rhodes="" d,="" &="" stone="" ba="" (1993).="" cell="" wall="" biosynthesis="" and="" its="" regulation.="" proceedings="" of="" the="" international="" symposium="" on="" forage="" cell="" wall="" structure="" &="" digestibility.="" editors="" jung="" h,="" buxton="" d,="" hartfield="" r,="" &="" ralph="" j.="" chapter="" 24:621-83.="" ·="" government="" &="" institutions="" internet="" sources:="" add="" authors="" if="" they="" are="" specified="" authors="" related="" to="" the="" article.="" food="" standards="" australia="" new="" zealand="" (fsanz):="" 19th="" australian="" total="" diet="" survey="" (2010).="" http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/scienceandeducation/publications/="" 19thaustraliantotaldietsurveyapril2001/19thaustraliantotaldietsurvey/partbresults.cfm="" (accessed="" xx="" november="" 14-2010).="" references="" named="" or="" cited="" in="" the="" text:="" ·="" for="" single="" article="" cited="" with="" 1="" or="" 2="" authors,="" (chan,="" 1999)="" (chan="" &="" steven,="" 2004)="" ·="" for="" single="" article="" cited="" with="" more="" than="" 2="" authors,="" only="" the="" first="" author="" is="" listed,="" (steven="" et="" al.,="" 2006)="" ·="" for="" multiple="" articles="" cited,="" list="" by="" order="" of="" the="" year="" of="" publication="" of="" the="" articles,="" (lucenda="" et="" al.,="" 2010;="" steven="" et="" al.,="" 2006;="" mohagen,="" 2004;="" cartwright="" et="" al.,="" 2000)="" ·="" for="" multiple="" articles="" by="" the="" same="" first="" authors="" appearing="" in="" different="" years,="" differentiate="" by="" a,b,csubscripts,="" (chana,="" 2003;="" chanb,="" 2003)="" (burke="" et="" al.,="" 2009a,="" burke="" et="" al.,="" 2009b)="" assignment="" topics="" choose="" only="" one="" 1.="" protein="" modifications="" during="" cooking="" and="" the="" impact="" on="" health.="" discuss="" the="" effects="" of="" cooking="" on="" protein="" in="" foods.="" do="" not="" focus="" on="" the="" cooking="" methods="" themselves="" as="" it="" deviates="" from="" the="" topic.="" rather,="" discuss="" the="" cooking="" methods="" that="" produces="" the="" modifications="" or="" changes.="" the="" focus="" of="" the="" assay="" should="" be="" on="" the="" cooking="" effects="" that="" include="" oxidative="" modification="" of="" proteins="" such="" as="" maillard="" reactions="" and="" other="" structural="" or="" conformational="" changes="" that="" affect="" protein="" digestibility.="" protein="" indigestibility="" will="" lead="" to="" loss="" of="" protein="" quality="" such="" as="" reduced="" availability="" of="" essential="" amino="" acids.="" digestion="" of="" modified="" proteins="" will="" produce="" modified="" amino="" acids="" that="" might="" cause="" harm="" to="" the="" body.="" 2.="" colonic="" fermentation="" of="" undigested="" proteins="" and="" health.="" what="" happen="" to="" undigested="" proteins?="" what="" products="" are="" form="" if="" they="" are="" fermented="" in="" the="" colon?="" what="" are="" the="" effects="" on="" health?="" you="" should="" leave="" out="" whey="" proteins="" as="" this="" belongs="" to="" topic="" 3.="" 3.="" bioactive="" peptides="" from="" fermentation="" of="" whey="" proteins="" and="" health.="" fermentation="" of="" whey="" proteins="" produces="" specific="" products="" and="" their="" effect="" on="" health="" has="" been="" widely="" studied.="" discuss.="" 4.="" immunogenic="" peptides="" generated="" from="" partial="" protein="" digestion="" and="" health.="" partial="" digestion="" of="" wheat="" gluten="" is="" known="" to="" generate="" immunogenic="" peptides="" that="" is="" like="" to="" diseases="" such="" as="" coeliac="" diseases.="" discuss.="">5 5 6 7 8 9-10 research depth 0 1 2 3 4 5 referencing:students are expected to be able to reference literature sources correctly at 3rd year level. as such, incorrect referencing will incur a penalty of up to -5 marks. research depth: refers to the number of literature read and discussed. just citing a publication does not constitute a count in research depth. america chemical society literature citation rules references (in alphabetical order): · journals articles authors. (year). article title. journal name. volume, pages. loo yt, howell k, chan m. zhang p & ng k (2020). modulation of the human gut microbiota by phenolics and phenolic fiber-rich foods. comprehensive review in food science & food safety, 19, 1268-1298. hsi-yang tang, zhongxiang fang & ken ng (2020). dietary fiber-based colon-targeted delivery systems for polyphenols. trends in food science & technology, 100, 333-348. note: there are many iteration of this referencing style and all are acceptable. for example, authors could be cited as loo, y.t. etc or completely spelled out, or article title or journal name, volume and pages in bold. the important rule is consistency, that is when you use one iteration style you must use the same for the whole work. · books: authors. in book title, edition no., editors publisher, year, vol. no., pages. smith, l; caldwell, a. cellulose in cell walls. in forage cell wall structure & digestability; keys, f., park, g., eds.; publisher: harwood academics, 2001; vol. 4, 261-295. · chapters in a book illyama k, lam tb, meikle jp, ng k, rhodes d, & stone ba (1993). cell wall biosynthesis and its regulation. proceedings of the international symposium on forage cell wall structure & digestibility. editors jung h, buxton d, hartfield r, & ralph j. chapter 24:621-83. · government & institutions internet sources: add authors if they are specified authors related to the article. food standards australia new zealand (fsanz): 19th australian total diet survey (2010). http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/scienceandeducation/publications/ 19thaustraliantotaldietsurveyapril2001/19thaustraliantotaldietsurvey/partbresults.cfm (accessed xx november 14-2010). references named or cited in the text: · for single article cited with 1 or 2 authors, (chan, 1999) (chan & steven, 2004) · for single article cited with more than 2 authors, only the first author is listed, (steven et al., 2006) · for multiple articles cited, list by order of the year of publication of the articles, (lucenda et al., 2010; steven et al., 2006; mohagen, 2004; cartwright et al., 2000) · for multiple articles by the same first authors appearing in different years, differentiate by a,b,csubscripts, (chana, 2003; chanb, 2003) (burke et al., 2009a, burke et al., 2009b) assignment topics choose only one 1. protein modifications during cooking and the impact on health. discuss the effects of cooking on protein in foods. do not focus on the cooking methods themselves as it deviates from the topic. rather, discuss the cooking methods that produces the modifications or changes. the focus of the assay should be on the cooking effects that include oxidative modification of proteins such as maillard reactions and other structural or conformational changes that affect protein digestibility. protein indigestibility will lead to loss of protein quality such as reduced availability of essential amino acids. digestion of modified proteins will produce modified amino acids that might cause harm to the body. 2. colonic fermentation of undigested proteins and health. what happen to undigested proteins? what products are form if they are fermented in the colon? what are the effects on health? you should leave out whey proteins as this belongs to topic 3. 3. bioactive peptides from fermentation of whey proteins and health. fermentation of whey proteins produces specific products and their effect on health has been widely studied. discuss. 4. immunogenic peptides generated from partial protein digestion and health. partial digestion of wheat gluten is known to generate immunogenic peptides that is like to diseases such as coeliac diseases. discuss. 3>