0.4H;: µ # 0.4O Ho: H = 0.4 vs. H: µ > 0.4O Ho: p = 0.4Hi:p # 0.4Vs.(b) State the indicated conclusion in nontechnical terms, being sure to address the original claim.An entomologist writes an...


(a) Express the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis in symbolic form for the following claim.<br>A manager claims that the average lunch break is more than 0.4 hours long.<br>O Ho: p = 0.4 vs.<br>H: p < 0.4<br>O Hg: 4 = 0.4 vs. H;: µ < 0.4<br>O Ho: H= 0.4 vs.<br>O Ho: p = 0.4 vs. H: p> 0.4<br>H;: µ # 0.4<br>O Ho: H = 0.4 vs. H: µ > 0.4<br>O Ho: p = 0.4<br>Hi:p # 0.4<br>Vs.<br>(b) State the indicated conclusion in nontechnical terms, being sure to address the original claim.<br>An entomologist writes an article in a scientific journal claiming that at most 1.48% of male fireflies are<br>unable to produce light due to a genetic mutation.<br>A hypothesis test of the claim has been conducted, and the decision from that test is to fail to reject Ho.<br>O There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the true proportion is at most<br>1.48%.<br>O There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the true proportion is at most<br>1.48%.<br>OThere is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is at most 1.48%.<br>O There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is at most 1.48%.<br>

Extracted text: (a) Express the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis in symbolic form for the following claim. A manager claims that the average lunch break is more than 0.4 hours long. O Ho: p = 0.4 vs. H: p < 0.4="" o="" hg:="" 4="0.4" vs.="" h;:="" µ="">< 0.4="" o="" ho:="" h="0.4" vs.="" o="" ho:="" p="0.4" vs.="" h:="" p=""> 0.4 H;: µ # 0.4 O Ho: H = 0.4 vs. H: µ > 0.4 O Ho: p = 0.4 Hi:p # 0.4 Vs. (b) State the indicated conclusion in nontechnical terms, being sure to address the original claim. An entomologist writes an article in a scientific journal claiming that at most 1.48% of male fireflies are unable to produce light due to a genetic mutation. A hypothesis test of the claim has been conducted, and the decision from that test is to fail to reject Ho. O There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the true proportion is at most 1.48%. O There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the true proportion is at most 1.48%. OThere is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is at most 1.48%. O There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is at most 1.48%.
Jun 07, 2022
SOLUTION.PDF

Get Answer To This Question

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here