-I need 12 power point slides for presentation of these 3 questions regarding case study(everything attached in pdf)-make sure you include maximum word count(key words) because i need to speak up to...

-I need 12 power point slides for presentation of these 3 questions regarding case study(everything attached in pdf)-make sure you include maximum word count(key words) because i need to speak up to 5-7 minutes in video presentation. so i can speak that much longer regarding questions- 4 slides for each questions and there is 3 questions.-all questions are related to one act of the law. so make sure, sections of the law you include should be from that one act which is mentioned in those questions- no referencing or particular word count required


Microsoft Word - CLWM4000 Assessment 3 Case Study CLWM4000: Business and Corporations Law Assessment 3 Case Study Anderson Pty Ltd is a company that manufactures bicycles for export to the European market. Its directors are Ramsay, Briscoe and Tan. Last year, Ramsay was sent by the company to survey the market in Europe. He managed to secure five contracts worth $1.5 million per year for the next three years. For four of the contracts, payment was by way of letter of credit but for the fifth contract with Zoe Ltd, payment was on delivery of the bicycles. According to Ramsay, Zoe Ltd operated one of the biggest hypermarkets in that country. Anderson Pty Ltd needed to expand its factory. Briscoe was tasked by the directors to oversee the award of the tender for the extension of the current factory. Briscoe told Lehman Contractor (LC) about the tender and said that LC should bid for it. LC was excited and told Briscoe that if he was awarded the tender, he would not charge Briscoe for the renovation of his house. Briscoe agreed to reveal to LC the bidding prices of other bidders to enable LC to bid the lowest. With the help of this strategy, LC’s bid was the lowest and the contract was awarded to them. The extension to the factory was duly completed. The company manufactured the bicycles and shipped them to the customers in Europe. Unfortunately, Zoe Ltd was actually a sham company. The bicycles were not paid for and Anderson Pty Ltd lost $200,000. The Board was very upset that Ramsay did not perform due diligence on Zoe Ltd before signing the contract and that they were misled into believing that Zoe Ltd operated one of the biggest hypermarket chains in that country. QUESTION 1 Explain what sections from the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) were breached by the Directors - Ramsay and Briscoe. QUESTION 2 Explain if Directors can be personally liable for civil penalties and criminal liabilities under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). QUESTION 3 Explain if Directors can be disqualified in Australia and if yes, for how long they can be disqualified under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).